Comments for John Coxon http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net An archive of writing by John Coxon. Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:44:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 Comment on Google Chrome and Download Managers by John http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/10/google-chrome-and-download-managers/comment-page-1/#comment-9 John Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:44:44 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=601#comment-9 I hereby eat my words – not only that, but it's got a better UI than the Firefox add-on, which definitely makes me happy. Thanks Freddie! I hereby eat my words – not only that, but it’s got a better UI than the Firefox add-on, which definitely makes me happy. Thanks Freddie!

]]> Comment on Google Chrome and Download Managers by Freddie http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/10/google-chrome-and-download-managers/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Freddie Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:17:12 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=601#comment-8 There is a Camelizer extension for chrome https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ghnomdcacenbmilgjigehppbamfndblo There is a Camelizer extension for chrome

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ghnomdcacenbmilgjigehppbamfndblo

]]> Comment on Google Chrome and Download Managers by John http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/10/google-chrome-and-download-managers/comment-page-1/#comment-7 John Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:00:18 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=601#comment-7 I literally have no idea why, the first time I tested that, it did not work. As you say, it appears to work perfectly. Thanks! I have edited the post somewhat to make it make sense, in light of this information... I literally have no idea why, the first time I tested that, it did not work. As you say, it appears to work perfectly. Thanks! I have edited the post somewhat to make it make sense, in light of this information…

]]> Comment on Google Chrome and Download Managers by Richard Crawshaw http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/10/google-chrome-and-download-managers/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Richard Crawshaw Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:44:28 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=601#comment-6 Dragging a URL (either from the address bar or a link) from Chrome on Windows to the desktop produces a shortcut. I can't see anything that would affect this behaviour so I wonder if the absence of it is Mac specific? Dragging a URL (either from the address bar or a link) from Chrome on Windows to the desktop produces a shortcut. I can’t see anything that would affect this behaviour so I wonder if the absence of it is Mac specific?

]]> Comment on E-Sport by Michael http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/09/e-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Michael Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:59:54 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=562#comment-3 Football does have fewer explosions, and that is a serious failing on its part. This leads to the question of how to add explosions to it. I reckon players in bomb squad style body armour playing on a pitch with randomly placed landmines (without shrapnel if that's absolutely necessary) would do the trick nicely. The armour should clear up some of the rolling on the floor after a foul too, which is an added benefit. Football does have fewer explosions, and that is a serious failing on its part. This leads to the question of how to add explosions to it.
I reckon players in bomb squad style body armour playing on a pitch with randomly placed landmines (without shrapnel if that’s absolutely necessary) would do the trick nicely. The armour should clear up some of the rolling on the floor after a foul too, which is an added benefit.

]]> Comment on E-Sport by E-Sport | John Coxon - Magazine-News - Magazine-News http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/2011/09/e-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-2 E-Sport | John Coxon - Magazine-News - Magazine-News Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:56:51 +0000 http://www.chickensinenvelopes.net/?p=562#comment-2 [...] See more here: E-Sport | John Coxon [...] [...] See more here: E-Sport | John Coxon [...]

]]>